David
Weinberger is one of my heroes. He was one of the four who wrote
The Cluetrain
Manifesto, which laid out the “why” of social media. He has a
hot blog The Journal of
Heuristic Organizations (JOHO), and he has a new book, Too
Big To Know, one of several recent books defining how
information,
education,
learning,
and society
are being changed by the
hyperlink.
I really like David
because he writes about important ideas and makes them useful in many
ways. As you can see from that hyperlink hyperlink, he can be a bit
of a smartass, meaning he finds shareable humor everywhere he goes.
What would you expect from a guy who was a writer for Woody Allen?
Over the weekend, I
enjoyed a 58 minute video, Authors
@ Google: David Weinberger (Thanks Google!) where David explains
parts of his new book. It was a two pages of notes presentation,
which means I got a lot of value per minute. This is new thinking,
not sit back entertainment, so I wrote the ideas, so I could think
about them later.
I think a lot about
models,
(Reality is too complex to parse in real time, models
are simplified versions of reality. Don’t confuse the model with
the reality), so one of the best bits in the video was the platypus.
After we noticed animal-vegetable-mineral, scientists set up an
organizing system, or taxonomy, so they would know where things fit
in relation to each other, and why
a tomato is a fruit.
The platypus didn't fit the classification requirements of the taxonomy, so the most common solution was the platypus couldn't exist. Wonder who told the platypus' mother?
Taxonomies are a way to
put everything in their one right place. That is important if you're
filing your data in libraries and books. The one right place no
longer matters in a hyperlinked world. Louie,
Louie shows up on every rock
playlist without being diminished.
Building on how hyperlinks change single point filing methodologies,
Weinberger then notes the value of having one true expert.
Since
knowledge is so hard to find, let’s certify specialists in specific
disciplines, so we can ask them the hard questions and get a quick
answer. What we notice next is one expert is an authority, two
experts is a disagreement. The hyperlinked world allows anyone who
cares to look at the original data, and I find the experts usually recommend a suboptimal solution for my need.
Now that hyperlinks let
each of us look at the original material, finding and understanding
what we need is different than relying on the one true expert. And that is why hyperlinks have changed our world.
Your thoughts?
Please join us
6 pm, March
13th,
at the Capital Technology
Management Hub, where Sales
Lab’s Jack
Gates presents Rainmaker 12, Lessons from
Makers,
followed by the featured CTMH Presentation, Sales
Lab’s Dick
Davies speaking about The
Direct Economy, How to Profit from The Most Lucrative Market in
the History of the World!
Dick:
ReplyDeleteThe platypus mom now understands why everything else looks so funny.
This is a vivid example of having only the experts' rendition of reality - what does not fit the model or taxonomy is not even footnoted - just ignored. Think about how many evolutionary humans are now categorized from the original two.
With the hyperlink we can benefit from the applied knowledge of the expert and also access the material directly to form our own conclusions, if we choose.
In school, when writing papers using the work of others we would footnote to cite the source. This did more to protect copyright than to expand knowledge.
With hyperlinks, we have the ability to immediately go to the source for more detail, and the process is so simple and easy to add the link that open sharing of knowledge is much more prevalent and cited authors receive recognition for their work.
Hyperlinks fight surface thinking (just repeating what you have been told with no original thought added) - this is a good thing!