In the last 90 days I’ve seen more
than ten promising organizations shut their doors. They just didn’t
see a way to continue.
A couple blamed a lack of monetization
strategy. They couldn’t find a get rich quick scheme.
Several others said they had key
contracts winding down.
I suspect the other two bored
themselves to death.
What I noticed was that they all made a
change to increase efficiency, curtail constructive time wasting.
Each had found a promising new service
to deliver, then turned it over to a fulfillment team. That
fulfillment team decided that their work created the value and
therefore all revenue was theirs, which meant work expanded to
require the resources available.
Which meant there is no hope for
further work.
Some time ago, I started the second
fulfillment factory for a national marketing firm. Previously I had
played a role in developing our systems at the main office. My second
attempt delivered the same results in less time and at one third the
cost, which caused distress among the HQ crew.
I endured a rash of audits,
inspections, and threats before the owner told his minions to back
off.
Why did it take an 800 mile move to cut
our costs by over 60%? Actually, we had to get space, vendors, and
new customers. It would have been a lot less effort at HQ, but it
also wouldn’t have been possible. Too many people had the wrong
perspective.
Clayton
Christensen says look out below for disruptive competition. A
corollary is to figure a way to reduce cost and improve service every
week to stave off disruption. If I don’t figure it out, some other
guy will.
Part of improvement is working with
prospects to define an offering they want more than what they are
getting. That’s not sales, that’s self preservation. I figure
that’s over 40% of value.
Joy’s
Law – The real talent pool.
No comments:
Post a Comment