Neither,
with a few exceptions.
Businesses
are run to meet buyers' needs and to make a profit. How they behave
is subject to the urgency of the buyer's need and the value the buyer
places on satisfying that need.
To
illustrate, let's look at two ice water stands set up by some
neighborhood kids.
Scene1:
The local marathon finish line is in the neighborhood and the two
ice water stands are set up by the finish line. Stand One is at the
finish line – ice water is 25¢
per glass, and Stand Two is 20 yards past the line – ice water
is15¢
per glass.
Which
stand gets the runners business? Stand One get the business because
the buyers urgency is to satisfy the thirst not shop for a 40%
discount.
Scene
2: The popular local park attracts a lot of visitors and the main
park trail ends in the neighborhood. Stand One is at Trail's End –
still charging 25¢,
and Stand Two is 20 yards further – charging 15¢.
Which
stand gets the park visitors business? The urgency of satisfying the
thirst is significantly less for the visitors than the marathoners,
consequently, the value of a glass of ice water is lower and a
majority of visitors will seek out the lower priced water of Stand
Two.
Scene
3: The local road cuts through the neighborhood with few cars per
hour. Stand One is located at the speed bump and Stand Two is 20
years further up the street – no change in the pricing by either
stand.
Which
stand gets the drivers business? Probably neither since there is no
urgency of need and many other alternatives the driver can seek
beyond the two local stands.
Is
Ice Water Stand One being mercenary for charging a high premium
because of its prime location in Scene 1?
Is
Ice Water Stand Two being predatory for discounting prices
significantly in Scene 2?
Probably
not – the stands are responding with their approach to meeting the
buyers' need-value proposition and to market competition.
While
Stand Two may have set prices based on a “fair profit” as an
idealist, the more likely reason is the discount is an attempt to
influence the buyers' need-value mix to attract sales. Similarly,
the premium charged by Stand One is recognition of the urgency of the
buyer to satisfy the need while recognizing the buyer has a
competitive choice is value takes precedent over urgency.
Do
these principals scale to other businesses? Yes, and they become more
complicated as new variables are added which affect cost, output, and
regulatory or social restrictions.
Buyers
won't buy unless they believe the need will be addressed by the
seller's solution and the price is compatible with the perceived
value.
Is
this why organizations with money in the coffers but few customer
sales are not interested in buying services to improve operations or
upgrade technology – and won't invest in improving the sales
process?
What
are you seeing?
SalesLab’s
next Rainmaker,
(Number 8!) is Google
+ Your
Personal Website, Fast, Free, and Findable!
the first 300 seconds of the
Capital
Technology Management Hub,
at 6 pm,
Tuesday, October 11th.
The headliner is Overcoming
Mobile Challenges in the Federal Government
- Sponsored by TeqCorner,
featuring Ferhan Hamid, CEO and Vikrant Binjrajka, CTO of INADEV.
1 comment:
What I get from your post is that which choices you make often depends on what you want to do. Even crowdsourcing for data is colored by the questions you ask. You don't go with your gut, you go with your prior experience, so getting relevant prior experience is more important than I previously realized.
Post a Comment