I was watching a friend
get crushed by his incompetent superior. It seemed inadvertent,
unsuccessful, and painful.
Actually, incompetent was
too strong a word. The superior was overmatched by his environment,
and didn’t take appropriate action. I see that happening
a lot.
Which got me thinking
about loyalty.
There is an internal
efficiency to demonstrating loyalty down the chain. One action is
communicated to all subordinates, behavior improves. Loyalty down is
a force
multiplier.
Loyalty up is for one
person, may be appreciated, often not.
Loyalty down has more
impact.
Please join us at the
Capital
Technology Management Hub on December 11 at 6:30 for 300 seconds
of Rainmaker
17 – Breaking The Invisible Wall, What we learned at last
month’s
GMU Annual
Startup Challenge Competition
at TeqCorner, followed by Joshua Green explaining Cleantech
Open—The
World’s Largest Cleantech Accelerator -Funding Green Technology
Startups
1 comment:
Loyalty is something given freely because it was earned in the eyes of the giver.
Perhaps we should have a separate term - like 'foyalty' to describe hollow loyalty based on fear - the instant the threat is gone, the 'loyalty' evaporates.
Since we're inventing new descriptive terms, another one would be 'cloyalty' to describe the boss's feined respect & 'loyalty' to the staff until not needed or remembered.
Even as kids, before we could see the ramifications of a lack of commitment and fair dealing, we knew we didn't like such actions.
Great post!
Post a Comment